Editorial
Scott Taylor is the best choice
There's no doubt about it: Whoever wins the race for mayor of Canby will
take the helm of a city that faces some daunting challenges and interesting opportunities.
The next mayor will have to deal with continued growth and the many issues associated with
it. He'll have to contend with the community's changing demographic profile and the need
for additional services. And he'll have to make some tough choices if one or more of the
tax-cutting measures on the November ballot passes.
Given the critical decisions that Canby will face in the next two years, the city needs
someone who has a proven track record of building consensus. The city needs someone who is
experienced at dealing with people at every level of government. Most importantly, the
city needs someone who can articulate a vision for Canby's future that can be translated
into action.
That man is Scott Taylor. He has been a dedicated public servant in Canby since 1982 - the
last eight years as mayor - and he deserves to be elected to another two-year term.
His challenger, Terry Prince, has raised some valid points that need to be addressed.
Prince is right in saying that communication between the city and the Canby Fire District
needs to be improved. He is right in saying that the future of the Urban Renewal District
needs to be broadly discussed. And his suggestion that the city devote more resources to
downtown rejuvenation is worthy of consideration.
Nevertheless, Prince has not demonstrated the ability to forge a consensus during some of
his years of service on the City Council. He has been valuable as a voice of dissent, and
many of his arguments have been persuasive. But Prince seems to have focused most of his
efforts on reacting instead of acting.
In addition, Taylor's prowess at dealing with complex issues is widely recognized. Prince,
too, is bright and conversant with the issues - but in the end, experience matters, and
Taylor has it in spades.
The mayor also has the edge when it comes to spelling out his vision for Canby,
particularly downtown. This became clear at the Canby Candidates Forum, when Taylor talked
about a thriving area featuring restaurants, coffee shops and places to go for
entertainment. Prince didn't speak about the city's future in the same way, and the
contrast in the candidates' outlooks was evident.
At this critical juncture in Canby's history, Taylor should remain mayor, and Prince
should stay on the council. The loss of either man in public office would be a disservice
to the community.
Re-elect Lucas,
Harris, Carson
In one of the most hotly contested races in recent Canby history, three
incumbent councilors are defending their positions on the City Council against the same
number of challengers.
And in this case, "defending" is not too strong a word. They've been criticized
for sending the city's 301-acre annexation plan to voters, they've been taken to task for
forming the Urban Renewal District, and they've been faulted for strained relationships
between the council and the Canby Fire District and the Canby Planning Commission.
Some of this criticism is deserved, and some of it is subject to debate. But none of the
issues raised by the challengers alters one important fact: Right now, Canby needs
experienced leaders on the City Council.
That's why voters should re-elect Randy Carson, Roger Harris and Barry Lucas to the
council. Not only are they well-versed on the issues, they have shown themselves to be
faithful community servants.
Challengers Teresa Blackwell, Patrick Johnson and Paul Dawson are relative newcomers to
the political arena. They have their community's best interests at heart, but the Herald
believes they need a little more seasoning before they take seats on the Canby City
Council.
It would be difficult, if not impossible, to take issue with the level of commitment that
Carson, Harris and Lucas have shown for their community. They haven't just limited
themselves to attendance at City Council meetings, where they display a thorough knowledge
of the issues; they have gone out of their way to attend community gatherings and events
on a regular basis. Individually and collectively, their resume is impressive.
None of their opponents has that kind of experience.
Johnson made a fine showing at the Canby Candidates Forum, and he has proven to be a good
communicator with some solid ideas. Nevertheless, Johnson would be well served by spending
some time on the city's Planning Commission or budget committee before taking a seat on
the council.
Dawson, too, has shown himself to be energetic and bright. He has done a good job of
grasping the issues, and he cares about Canby. But like Johnson, Dawson should gain some
experience on a city board before serving on the council. Blackwell, meanwhile, is a
member of the Canby Planning Commission, but she has not addressed some of the major
issues facing Canby. Until she does, we feel she should remain on the Planning Commission.
Citizens are fortunate to have six qualified candidates running for City Council who care
about the community, but sometimes caring isn't enough. The city needs proven
decision-makers on the council - and we think Carson, Harris and Lucas are the best
choices on the ballot. |
Letters
to the editor
Adult center drivers
deliver 397 meals
Canby Adult Center's Share-A-Meal starts out as a low rumbling right after
Peddler's Market in September. Menu ideas are discussed during staff meetings. Next,
office personnel start working on a master list of businesses in the area.
About two weeks prior to the event, letters are sent out to all the businesses, inviting
them to participate in our fund-raiser. They are given a choice of two meals, each priced
at $6, and delivered to their door at lunch time.
In the kitchen, our cooks are busy ordering food and asking volunteers to help in the
kitchen that day. Meanwhile, our home delivered meals coordinator seeks people to drive a
route. The last week, follow up phone calls confirm the final meal orders and then routes
are laid out. Cooking begins the day before, and the kitchen is full of busy hands until
every last meal is out the door the following day.
Everyone is tired when Share-A-Meal is over, yet most do it year after year and enjoy it.
It's impossible to name all the volunteers who make this event work. They just jump on
board and do what's needed to make it successful. I feel fortunate to live in a community
where people believe in giving back. I believe that's the ingredient that makes Canby
great.
This month we delivered 397 meals and earned $1,262. We had drivers for 12 different
routes. Most averaged seven stops. This is a record number of meals, and we want to thank
the business community for its strong support.
Our next Share-A-Meal will be May 15, 2001. We hope you will plan now to participate again
in the spring.
Anna Phillips, director
Canby Adult Center
We don't need
another tax base
I urge everyone to vote against Measure 3-99, establishing a tax base for the Blue Heron
Recreation District. This is simply a push to establish a new tax base. This idea has been
voted down twice before, but it keeps coming back. If approved, it is a tax base that will
never go away.
We presently pay property taxes to Clackamas County and the city of Canby.
Both of these entities fund park departments - why do we need a third to do what the
others could do? Because board members of the BHRD and some of our elected officials want
an additional tax base that will never go away.
The amount asked for - 29 cents per $1,000 of assessed value - does not seem like a lot of
money, but the point is that twice before this issues has been voted down. (They wanted 66
cents per $1,000 last time.)
As BHRD board member Joe Driggers stated after the last defeat, "We are planning on
putting out a tax base proposal every two years until we get it." (Canby Herald, July
28, 1999). With this type of response to what the public has said I ask - is this the type
of new bureaucracy you want to create and give a new tax base to?
As a side note, Bob Traverso of Canby Sand and Gravel has offered a land donation to the
BHRD contingent on the passing of this measure. This is the same type of scenario that led
to the formation of the North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District (not to be confused
with the Clackamas County Parks Department), a district that is now in financial
difficulties and asking their taxpayers to bail them out. (See the measure following 3-99
in your Voters Pamphlet.)
If we truly desire more parks and open spaces, it can be done through the Clackamas County
Parks Department or the city of Canby Parks Department. We do not need another tax base
that will never go away.
Vote No on 3-99!
Gary Kordenat
Canby
Blue Heron district
raises serious issues
I have questions and concerns about the way measure 3-99, establishing a tax base
for the Blue Heron Recreation District, is being presented to the voters.
State Rep. Kurt Schrader and board members of the BHRD have stated no employees will be
hired. I ask then - Who will provide the labor for future development? Who will provide
the future maintenance? Who will provide for the safety of future users of the facilities?
I contend that employees would need to be hired. We certainly would not want to use school
district or city of Canby employees as has been implied.
I ask then, where would the money for this come from? Answer: Increase the tax base. I
know the directors of the BHRD want more money than the 29 cents per $1,000 of assessed
value. (They asked for 66 cents per $1,000 the last
time they tried to get this measure passed.) They have lowered the price tag simply to get
their foot in the door.
In response to statements concerning the value of the land Bob Traverso of Canby Sand and
Gravel would donate to the BHRD, $1.5 million (Canby Herald, Sept. 27, 2000) or $2 million
(Kurt Schrader, Oregon Voters Pamphlet).
I want to know where those values came from. According to Clackamas County records, the
property is being taxed at a value of less than $300,000.
In response to the statements made by BHRD board member Joe Driggers and Oregon State
Representative/BHRD Chairperson Kurt Schrader that this property (donation by Bob
Traverso) "needs to be preserved before its gone," I urge everyone to become
familiar with this property.
It is: mainly an abandoned logging road (4 miles long) outside of the Canby city limits;
an extension of the road on which a Canby woman was recently sexually assaulted (inside
the city limits); zoned EFU - Exclusive Farm Use; outside the Urban Growth Boundary;
primarily inside the Molalla flood plain; in need of extensive repair; impossible to
police.
This is not property that is in high demand by anyone, nor is it my idea of open spaces or
prime parkland that I want my tax dollars spent on. Vote No on 3-99.
Don Morgan
Canby
Oppose measures
that hurt schools
In August, two Parent-Teacher Association board members from Eccles Elementary
School attended a regional PTA conference that featured a presentation on the measures in
the November election that would affect schools.
Because of the serious impact these measures would have on our schools if passed, we
invited an Oregon PTA board member to share the group's positions at our recent general
membership meeting.
After hearing some of the sobering facts about measures that would drastically cut funding
of education and social services in Oregon, the Eccles PTA would like to also share the
Oregon PTA's recommendations. The Oregon PTA supports Ballot Measures 94, 1 and 5, and
opposes 88, 91, 92, 93, 95, 98, 8 and 9. Please vote for our schools!
PTA Board
Eccles Elementary School
Blue Heron district
is a good deal
Before casting your ballot in this election, voters in the Canby, Carus, and
Ninety-One areas may want to look closer at the Blue Heron Recreation District's Measure
3-99. I did, and I think you might be surprised at how good this would be for our area.
If 3-99 passes, Bob Traverso from Parker Northwest has offered to donate land to the
district worth more than $1.5 million. This would allow extension of the logging road
bicycle and walking path. The funds would even allow purchase of land so the path could
run all the way to the Willamette River Greenway.
Other projects like the swim area on the Molalla River at the Knight's Bridge would get
cleaned up and become much safer for the many people who already use the area. By working
with other organizations, the plan means no bureaucracy and will leverage other funds to
do even more.
I think this is a good deal for our area, and plan on voting Yes on Measure 3-99.
Ryan Oliver
Canby
Council members
have done a good job
I'm not a very politically motivated person. I am, however, a person who feels he
must speak up at this time. I don't feel a change, just for the sake of change, is good if
you don't get the right people.
I have watched the incumbents work very hard at making Canby a good place to live, not
only as councilmen and mayor, but with Canby Kids, Canby Boosters and other organizations.
I've lived in Canby most of my life and have loved it always. I have always been proud of
the planning and foresight that has been shown by both the city and Canby Utility to keep
Canby from becoming a Beaverton.
My confusion with the no-growth candidates is that while we have no growth, does that mean
all Canby and school employees' wages and benefits stay the same? Will gas prices stay the
same? Will all the equipment and materials stay the same? I don't think they will or think
they should, but who pays? The taxpayers who are here.
At the Candidates Forum, Terry Prince, candidate for mayor, said groups that get grants
from the city could be gone next year. I think these groups give the taxpayers their best
bang for the dollar. Let's stay with what we have, a hardworking council.
Wayne Oliver
Canby
Council incumbents
need to be replaced
After attending the candidates' question-and-answer session at the Canby Adult
Center last week, and reading Mr. Roger Harris' comments in the Oct. 18 Herald, I have
come to the firm conclusion that the City Council incumbents need to be replaced. Any
governing body that truly represents the citizenry does not always blindly vote 6-0 on all
issues brought before it.
I would prefer a more balanced council that actually studies the issues and listens to its
citizens' concerns before they vote. The nearsightedness of our present City Council is in
only listening to the committees they appoint. While I can appreciate volunteers who work
on these committees, I can't say that I have ever been called or even mailed a
questionnaire from any of them. Neither have my neighbors.
Some of the subjects they discuss (public safety, roads, parks, residential and commercial
annexations) seem to beg for broader public input. Matters such as the URD and other new
developments that will have an impact on nearby residents need to be reviewed by those
residents before the matter is brought to the Planning Commission or the City Council.
That Mr. Harris finds that mayoral candidate Terry Prince "negative" I find
amusing. Instead of promoting any positive change in his article, he instead uses the
article as a negative campaign against Mr. Prince. I think Terry speaks from his heart as
a Canby resident, and is not afraid to vote against an issue when he doesn't agree with
it.
If that makes him negative, well God bless him!
Jim Gibson
Canby
CTA really stepped
up to the plate
It's businesses like Canby Telephone Association that makes a difference in
Canby. They stepped up to the plate when approached about installing a public telephone at
the new skate park.
CTA will make no money from this phone. The safety of our young people was more important
to them than making a buck. This is what makes Canby what it is - a great place to live.
Thank you, Canby Telephone, for your promptness and willingness to give rather than
receive.
Canby Area Chamber of Commerce
Canby
CCC bond is worthy
of our support
Like thousands of other productive citizens of this area, I began my higher
education experience at Clackamas Community College.
From its very beginning, the college has offered a diverse and affordable education.
The college board is now asking us to support them by voting yes on Measure 3-97.
This measure is a $47 million bond issue which will be used to add more classrooms,
improve technology and repair worn out facilities. This measure will cost only about $2.50
per month for the owner of a $150,000 home.
Is it worth it? Just ask any of the 27,000 or so students who attend Clackamas Community
College each year. Please join me in voting Yes on Measure 3-97.
Dan Wilcox
Canby
Measure 9 doesn't
single out gays
Contrary to desperate voter pamphlet arguments, Measure 9, the Student Protection
Act, is not hateful, singling out gay students for harassment.
M-9 says all students, heterosexual or homosexual, should be protected from a lifestyle
that can kill them. M-9 says all students are welcome at school, but not all behaviors
should be tolerated or "celebrated," especially if illegal or harmful.
M-9 calls for objective truth in curriculum, not political slants lying that condoms equal
safe sex and AIDS is not a "gay" disease. M-9 asks counselors to present all
options, not just affirm a confused teen into homosexuality and tell them they have no
choice.
M-9 says to GLSEN, PP and other adult activists from outside the school that they are not
welcome to use our schools as a recruiting ground or as a platform for pushing radical
agendas. (National GLSEN has Oregon affiliates in Portland, Eugene and Grants Pass).
M-9 gives parents/students support in objecting locally to explicit materials or teacher
behavior that offends them. M-9 will help keep Oregon schools from getting as bad as those
in Massachusetts where GLSEN creates gay student clubs to push homosexual issues in
classroom and library; or California where legislators just passed a law mandating the
"appreciation" of homosexuality in classrooms along with $2 million to rewrite
curricula and train teachers.
It frightens me that the NEA/OEA, PTA and School Board Assoc., along with Oregon
Department of Education, disagree with the intent of M-9 while pretending to be guardians
of our children. That is all the more reason we need to send them a clear message from a
majority of Oregonians saying we want M-9 to keep our schools fair, honest, academic and
free of homosexual activism - for the health and safety of all Oregon students.
Pat Smith
Canby
Measure 3-99 is
good for our future
To paraphrase an old expression, "Acquire land. They're not making any more
of it." I'm referring to Ballot Measure 3-99 and its sponsor, the Blue Heron
Recreation District.
How do we balance residential and commercial development with open space (including farm
and forest land) that, historically, has been Canby's identity? Part of the answer lies in
the commitment by like-minded citizens to preserve open space and to plan for future park
and recreation areas. One of the strategies in this process is to take advantage of
opportunities to acquire feasible land within the district.
Passage of Ballot Measure 3-99 would also recognize the BHRD as a viable entity with the
ability to pursue grants and establish partnerships with other park and recreation
advocates. After reading the measure, I hope that you will conclude that a fixed tax base
of 29 cents per $1,000 valuation is a small price to pay for preservation.
Please join me in voting Yes on Ballot Measure 3-99.
Rick Maier
Canby
Blackwell would
work for community
I have known Teresa Blackwell for over four years now, and I consider it a
privilege to tell you and your readers a little bit about her from a working aspect.
I work in the Clackamas County Courthouse, so I see quite a lot of her and talk with her a
lot. She has always been the type of person that tends to see the good in the people
around her, and that simply makes her a pleasant person to be around.
Beyond that, I always see her trying to make any little (or big) thing around her better
than it already is. She is a bundle of energy that is always solving problems or making
other people around her more comfortable.
I do believe that her election to this position would only work for the good of the
community and I further believe you would see some changes for the better. I count myself
very lucky to be able to call her a friend.
Larry Johnson
Milwaukie
Support candidates
who serve the public
Three years ago, when Randy Carson was contemplating running for Canby City
Council, he began attending city meetings. Randy attended council meetings, Planning
Commission meetings, Budget Committee meetings, even Traffic and Safety meetings for a
year to prepare for a seat on the council.
Thus, I developed a great respect for Randy's dedicated service and his thorough
preparation. I also have deep respect for Barry Lucas. In his four years on the council,
Barry has been the point man on very positive innovations. It is largely due to Barry's
indefatigable efforts that we now have a skate park.
I applaud everyone who is willing to get involved in helping our community. But, in
choosing our leaders, let's choose wisely. In contrast to Randy's thorough preparation for
a council seat and Barry's enthusiastic immersion in community projects, the new
challengers for the council have been frighteningly uninvolved.
One is apparently so uninvolved that none of us even knows who he is. Another, during his
less than two years in Canby, was appointed to one advisory board, which he resigned when
he felt he was not getting his way.
And the third, while I believe she is well intentioned, is such a silent member of the
Planning Commission that an observer could easily wonder if she took a vow of silence at
the time of her appointment.
This election is very important to the future of our community. Please join me in
supporting those leaders who care enough to be truly involved and are genuine servants of
the public.
Roger Harris
Canby City Council member
Please vote Yes
on Measure 3-99
I urge you to vote yes for the Blue Heron District Measure 3-99. I not only think
it would be good for Canby, but absolutely necessary. As tax dollars get tighter for both
the city and the schools, we need a plan to be able to acquire property for recreation.
I've been a member of Canby Kids for many years and have, at one time or another,
scheduled most of the sports. I see the shortage of available space for games and
practices.
I also see the need for parks and open spaces for those activities that do not require a
field, such as family outings and picnics.
I have heard all the negatives, but this measure has no bureaucracy or hidden agendas. It
is simply to acquire land before it is all gone. Please vote Yes.
Wayne Oliver
Canby
Candidates need to
stick to the issues
First, I would like to thank the Canby Herald for focusing on the local
candidates and their positions in Election 2000.
However, I hate election time! It seems it gives those in office or those running for
office a "right" to personally attack their opponent rather than the issues at
hand.
Thank goodness, so far, our Canby Herald reporters have stated "just the facts"
that have come out during the debates and forums that have been held.
We, as voters, either need to go to these meetings and hear for ourselves first hand, or
rely on news media for information to draw proper conclusions and vote for "the good
of Canby."
In reading the Oct. 18 issue, I found my first paragraph to be right on target. Mr.
Harris' opening comment led me to believe he was not pleased to run for re-election, but
didn't want to be accused of deserting a sinking ship.
If he had been running for mayor, I might have dismissed most of his comments as
"politically inclined" but since he is just running for re-election as a
councilman, I take offense with it.
I would like to share some observations I have gleaned from this newspaper that may help
him out. Mr. Prince, during the debate, said he believed the URD should be pared down to
downtown revitalization.
Phased development is great because it progresses slowly - not all at once. We've seen the
businesses develop, one at a time, which is not against growth, but slow growth. Never did
we hear any complaint from the Fire District over these businesses because they were
involved from the beginning and their input was valuable.
At the last ballot, I believe, about two-thirds of the patrons in this city voted for the
good of the growth of Canby, not the developers. Through annexation they should pay their
own way, just as the builders had to do in constructing the houses in these new
subdivisions.
Taxpayers are not pleased when we forfeit more money that we get in services. The issues
are important to us, not the mud slinging. Please campaign on issues so we know just where
you stand and what we can expect you to do - if we vote for you.
We know we must grow, but we want to keep the quality of life we have and know who is
paying for that growth.
If it was, or is, good enough for builders to pay their fair share to construct houses for
us to live in, then it is absolutely a must that those in the industrial park pay their
own way, too. Those in Phase I did. And Fred Meyer went above and beyond their fair share.
Mr. Harris, please speak to the issues at hand and get off the mayoral band wagon.
Let Mayor Taylor and Councilman Prince have their space. They are adults and can speak for
themselves. Tell us what you have accomplished during your last four years, so we may see
if your record will warrant our vote, or have us spend it on one of the
"newcomers" in town.
Donna Jean McManamon
Canby
Please support our
community college
For the past 34 years, Clackamas Community College has provided a quality
educational experience for all learners from high school age to senior citizens.
"Lifetime Learning" has been an essential element of the philosophy of Clackamas
Community College since its inception.
All who care about quality and affordable education and training for the citizens of
Clackamas County are urged to vote and support the upcoming bond levy for the college.
Please find out about the needs of the college and vote yes on Measure 3-97.
Why the need for a bond levy? Enrollment at CCC is expected to increase by more than 30
percent in the next 10 years. The college has experienced a 20 percent growth in the last
five years. Classrooms are needed. Also, the present buildings are in need of repair and
upgrading to meet th
e needs of new technology. Our current investment must be protected. What will the bond
levy cost? The bond levy will cost 20 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value. This
means that a person with property valued at $150,000 would pay $30 per year or $2.50 per
month. This is less than a six pack of Coke. Is it reasonable or responsible to neglect
supporting our community college for the sum of $2.50 per month?
Again, your vote is needed. So, please join me in voting Yes on Measure 3-97. Thank you.
Dick Brown
Canby
|