Marine patrol on the
lookout for troubled waters

pg1a7-5-00.jpg (31233 bytes)

Photo by Steve Wilkowske

Clackamas County Marine Patrol trainee Andy Schmidt, Deputy Doug Olsen and new recruit Scott King (l-r) cruise the Willamette River near the Interstate 5 Boone Bridge recently.

By Curt Kipp
for the Herald

The sun is out - and that means so are the boats. The Clackamas County Sheriff's Marine Patrol cruises the rivers and lakes of Clackamas County 365 days a year.

But summer is the patrol's busiest time of year, as more and more people venture out onto the water to enjoy the sunshine.

The deputies of the patrol consider safety the most important part of their job. It's something they spend a lot of their time on, whether they're inspecting boats, making rescues or visiting schools to talk about water safety.

Rescues are frequent. The patrol has performed more than 30 rescues so far this year, and did 52 in 1999 - an average of one per week.

But that's not all they do.

The deputies must also enforce fish and game regulations, settle arguments, look for intoxicated boaters, watch for expired licenses and solve crimes.

The last duty, solving crimes, is something they do particularly well.

This year, CCSO Deputy Doug Olsen was named Investigator of the Year by the International Association of Marine Investigators.

In 1999, he recovered $66,000 worth of stolen property, including two boats, three personal watercraft and 13 outboard motors.

Police who spend their time in squad cars develop an "eagle eye" - a sense of what to look for. It's much the same out on the water.

But some things are a bit different.

"In a car, you can tell the bad cars. The driver of that dilapidated car might be wanted on a warrant. You can read the cars," Olson said. "Out here, you can't do that. You might see a beat-up fishing boat and some prominent attorney might be driving it."

As a result, the deputies cruise with binoculars and watch the boats more carefully than they do cars. They look for current registrations. They look for life jackets. They look to see what people are doing on the boats. And when they see something they don't like, they stop and conduct a safety inspection.

"If I want to stop a car, I need probable cause," Olsen said. "Out here, we can stop the boats and direct them to a safe harbor and do a safety check."

Safety checks include looking at the engine exhaust, testing the horn and looking for life jackets - one for each person on the boat. Adults aren't required to actually wear them on the water, but kids 12 and under are.

We observed the Marine Patrol in action on the Willamette River near Wilsonville one Friday afternoon.

Boaters were out taking full advantage of the sunny weather.

It wasn't long before Dep. Doug Olsen spotted a boat going the other way with an improper license tab display. The letters weren't spaced correctly.

He turned the Boston Whaler around and caught the other boat.

Trainee Andy Schmidt soon tied the boats together with a rope.

Olsen explained the display requirements to the boat owner, Mike O'Rourke of Rivergrove, and offered to perform a safety check.

Good news. The boat was in working order. The O'Rourkes had enough life jackets for everyone. And O'Rourke's young grandson, Brett, was wearing his snug-fitting jacket as required.

Olsen turned to the boy. "Hey there, big guy. How you doing?"

He handed Brett a gift certificate for a soft serve cone from Dairy Queen. "We use this as a reward for kids to make sure they wear their life jackets," he said.

Olson sent the O'Rourkes on their way with a wave - and he and his crew start looking again.

Olson soon found another boat - this one without current license tags. He pulled up and asked for registration information.

"Everything's current if you were to call on this number," replied the driver, a blond woman in a spotted bikini. "I didn't get my stickers on today. It's my fault entirely."

Olson called in and found that everything was current.

Olson pulled the boat over to a nearby dock to get it out of traffic and did a safety check. He found life jackets for everyone. The youngest passenger, a 12-year-old boy, was wearing his as required.

Olson looked closely at the jacket and found a problem. It was not a Coast Guard-approved model.

The woman's jaw dropped a touch. She said she just bought the life jacket that day, specifically for that trip, because she knew the boy had to have it.

"Am I getting a ticket today?" she asked.

"I will be issuing a citation for the personal flotation device for the child," Olson said.

But he thought about it more and decided to let this one go.

"Thank you, sir," the woman said. "It's our first time out on the water."

Olson handed the woman a piece of paper - the results of her safety check.

It had check marks - one for the expired tags, one for the improper life jacket and one for not having a fire extinguisher on board the boat.

"Each of these checks represents a $175 citation you could have had," Olson told her.

Later, Olson explained why he let the woman off without a fine. "Part of what we do is educational," he said. "If I can get the message across with a warning, we will. If I think it takes a citation, we'll write it."

Olson's leniency has limits, though. If he sees a small child without a life jacket, he won't let that go. Small children should always be wearing a life jacket because they can't react fast enough to put them on in a crisis situation, he said.

Olson wants to deal with situations through prevention. And who can blame him? The patrol has a lot of ground - or in this case, water - to cover.

They are responsible for the Willamette River starting from the Sellwood Bridge south past Oregon City and Willamette Falls, all the way to Butteville, west of Wilsonville.

They must also patrol the Clackamas River, the Molalla River, and portions of the Tualatin and Pudding rivers.

And then there are lakes high and low - Timothy Lake, North Fork Reservoir, Rosylyn Lake, Trillium Lake and Harriet Lake, for starters.

The many bodies of water - and boaters enjoying them - means long hours in the summer.

"In the summertime, we pretty much will run 10-hour days," Olson said. "We're out late. We don't get weekends off."

Of course, winters are worse. There's not much to protect deputies from the cold out on the water, where they are exposed to freezing winds.

"A lot of people ask how you get a great job like this," Olson said. "My standard response is, come on out here in February."

Every once in a while, Marine Patrol deputies are called on to settle conflicts. Anglers will complain that someone else has cut them off or is fishing their spot in a river or lake. And there are also conflicts between larger boats and personal watercraft, also called jet skis.

"The personal watercraft would like to jump the waves, and the best way to do that is to get close to a boat," he said. "We've had a lot of accidents, a lot of close calls."

Most boat owners don't like to be buzzed by the jet skis. It makes them nervous because they can't tell which way the personal craft are going. "If everyone had more courtesy to the other boater, we wouldn't have the conflicts," Olson said.

There are also problems associated with alcohol. For some people, it's a long-standing tradition to have an open beer on their open boat.

"It is not illegal to have an open container and be driving a boat, where in a car, you can't have that open container," Olson said. "But we are looking. If we stop them, we'll be looking for signs of intoxication."

What happens if deputies think a boater has been drinking too much? How can they tell for sure? It's difficult to make someone walk a straight line in a swaying boat, Olson said. But there are ways to tell if someone is drunk.

Deputies can look for slurring of speech, odor, and other signs of intoxication. They can also give eye-tracking tests, and even take people to shore for balance tests if necessary.

Olson finds it's a constant battle to teach people that boating under the influence is wrong. "Historically, alcohol and boating have gone together," he said. "It's taken a long time to get people's views changed. People know it's not OK to drink and drive. That's slowly starting to get translated over to boating."

The Marine Patrol does arrest people if necessary. It will take them to a waiting patrol car on the shore, and the car will take them to jail. If the arrested person was the one in charge of the boat, the police will dock the boat or turn it over to a responsible friend.

Boating under the influence is a misdemeanor. The fourth offense is considered a felony, and driving under the influence convictions count toward that total.

Intoxicated boaters cannot lose their driver's license, and there is no such thing as a boater's license for the time being. However, they can lose the privilege of driving a boat for up to three years.

By the year 2010, all power boat operators will be required to carry a Boater Education Card. The requirement will be phased in starting in 2002. The Oregon State Marine Board has more complete information at their web site, www.boatoregon.com.

Land-based cops are sometimes drawn into car chases when someone refuses to pull over. Has that happened to Olson?

"I've only had one boat try and elude me," he said. "It was a personal watercraft (on the Willamette River). I chased him all the way down to Ross Island."

The man went to jail on an attempt to elude charge, but the charge was later dropped.

"We did not prove by a reasonable doubt he knew we were behind him and we were chasing him," Olson said.

The excuse is unlikely to work now. The patrol has added sirens, public address systems and overhead lights to their boats, just like a patrol car has.

Olson spotted a third boat - this one a small paddleboat. He pulled up to it as it docked at a Butteville Road residence.

The boat had two teenage girls and a younger boy. None had life jackets, so Olson cited one of the girls into Juvenile Court. She was the oldest one, so she was deemed the responsible party.

As he explained the citation, a chunk of watermelon struck the sheriff's boat. It came from a dock about 50 feet over, where several older teenage boys were having a good time.

The patrol went over for a chat with the boys. One immediately fesses up to having thrown the fruit, though he claims he threw it straight up and not laterally. The wind must have caught it, he said.

Olson didn't buy it.

"You're lucky you're not going to jail for harassment," he told the boy. "It's unwanted physical touching and you will go to jail.

"If you've got a problem, flag us down. If you throw stuff, we will take you to jail."

Olson started up the boat and pulled away from the dock.

"We could have easily taken them to jail," Olson said. "He got the message, I think." And if not? "If they're going to be like that, we'll talk to them again," he said.


School board approves $32.8
million spending plan

By Stephanie South
of the Herald

After many meetings and several adjustments, the 2000-2001 proposed general fund budget was unanimously adopted by the Canby School District board of directors at its Thursday meeting.

The bulk of the $32.8 million general fund budget will go to support instruction and provide student services.

The proposed budget was developed in conjunction with building principals and district staff after a comprehensive process beginning in January 2000. The budget was unanimously approved in April by the citizen budget committee.

"This budget process has been so extensive," said Deborah Sommer, superintendent of the Canby School District. "We've made so many changes." Following passage of the $30.8 million bond on May 16, the school board passed a resolution to incorporate the bond into the approved budget.

On June 5, the board held a public hearing to amend the approved budget to include appropriations for capital expenditures and payment on the additional debt services.

At Thursday's meeting, Canby School Board Chairwoman Sandy Ricksger gave an overview of the goals taken into account in the budget development process.

The goals include building an understanding among principals, board members and budget committee members of the budgetary needs and issues; increasing student achievement for all learners; creating a district/school environment that supports a community of learners; maintaining positive school/community relationships to enhance student learning; expanding ownership of the proposed budget and budget process; and proposing expenditures that are within the limits of anticipated revenues.

After a lengthy review process, the board and budget committee identified $1.8 million in additional needs for services such as summer school and the hiring of security officers.

This amount, which doesn't include maintenance needs, means the district is unable to continue the same level of expenditure in all areas of the general fund as in the past.

As a result, $628,000 was cut from existing programs and services so that about one-third of the identified new needs could be funded in the 2000-01 fiscal year.

"The process was excellent, and we really need to commend our superintendent Deborah Sommer," Ricksger said.

The proposed expenditures and corresponding reductions are based on identified Board priorities.

Some of the new needs include providing tutoring for students who aren't meeting benchmark standards and providing a district-supported preschool for at-risk students. The new needs also include enhancing the ESL program by hiring a translator and an ESL secretary. With 82 percent of the district's budget designated for personnel, there will be a reduction of 16 staff in secretarial, library, instructional assistant, and teaching positions as well as extra curricular activities and support services expenditures.

This shift will help the district address needs of students who are not meeting the state academic standards, which is the number one priority of the Board.

Mine plan continues to
spark concerns

By David Howell
of the Herald

Numerous Knights Bridge Road residents and produce business operators in the vicinity continue to worry about the potential effects of a proposed local mining operation.

The Aurora-Butteville-Barlow Community Planning Organization met with the Oregon Asphaltic Paving Co. representatives for the third time this year at Cutsforth's Old Town Hall last month.

CPO Chairwoman Adella Cramer and her husband, Steve, said little new information was gleaned from two company-contracted experts in attendance. About 23 A-B-B CPO members were at the June 19 meeting.

The Cramers said members felt Peter Coffey and Kerry Standlee failed to alleviate deep-seated concerns about traffic impacts and noise.

A month earlier, the group felt two other company-contracted experts discussing well water contamination, wetlands, emissions and other issues also failed to eradicate people's concerns.

"None of them could provide us guarantees," Adella Cramer said. "In fact, we now even have worse fears."

Almost 50 wells in the area provide residents with water for drinking and bathing, and ensuring the future safe supply of water is the paramount concern, she added.

Concerns about rock mining residual debris compromising the aquifer, and the storage of on-site diesel fuel were aired. Residents noted the area has been prone to flooding many times in the past, and they worried a future flood including mining debris would pose even more hazards.

"If the aquifer is ruined, we wouldn't have our water, we couldn't continue to live here, but we wouldn't be able to sell our houses," she said.

"We cannot hook up to city (of Canby) water. We have no place to go. All of us feel very strongly about water, and traffic. Those are two of our main concerns."

Tony Urbanek, the president of Oregon Asphaltic and three related Troutdale-based companies, said Thursday his company has yet to make a formal application with the Clackamas County Planning Department.

The company owns about 177 acres north of Knights Bridge Road, and plans to mine about half that acreage, he added. Its 1989 application to mine the site was denied by a county hearings officer, but changes in the state's Goal 5 rules categorizing aggregate as a natural resource has resulted in numerous mining applications being approved statewide, including in the Canby area.

"We want to reach an understanding with neighbors before we submit an application, and we may change our plan based on what is discussed with them," he said.

"There is no set timeline for us. We'll continue (to meet) until it's clear in everybody's mind what our intentions are, and what possibility there is for (water contamination)."

Urbanek said residents' concerns about the future of their well water and aquifer may have more to with other possible pollutants than gravel digging.

"People should be concerned with contamination from farm use rather than a mine out there," he said. "We don't use pesticides . . . I was really surprised when people said they were taking drinking water out of 15-foot wells, which several people claimed. I would be concerned wherever I lived if I had a well only 15 feet deep."

Adella Cramer said she knew of no instances where longtime residents, including a couple in their mid-80s, reported farm-related pollution had affected well water in the 26 years she has lived in the area.

She knew of no unusual illnesses over the years that could be attributed to such well water contamination, but several of the shallow wells had to be treated for bacterial contamination after the most recent flood.

Company hydrology expert David Newton told attendees of the May 8 meeting the flow of ground water would take it away from domestic water wells in times of flooding, thus negating the contamination threat. Residents disagreed, and sought a guarantee wells would not be compromised by the mining operation, which was not forthcoming.

Oregon Asphaltic reported its planned hours of operation for a 91-acre mine would be 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. Mondays to Fridays, and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturdays. Initially, the company had stated it would not operate at weekends.

The impact of heavy truck traffic on the main road west of Canby to Interstate 5 was discussed by Coffey.

"He said there would be 88 trucks going out and in of the mine per day," Adella Cramer said. "He said it will be about 178 vehicles per day going in and out, which would include employee vehicles and delivery trucks."

Coffey told meeting attendees a study of traffic along Knights Bridge Road tallied 7,800 vehicles going past the site, located behind Hoffman's Dairy Garden, each day at an average speed of 52 miles per hour.

Some produce growers and nurseries worry daily truck fuel and mining emissions could affect the quality of vegetables, plants and fruits in the short term, and their business viability in the long term.

CPO members felt the two experts, like their two predecessors last month, seemed to be unready to answer specific questions regarding the proposed mine.

"Basically, the deal was they brought in their experts again, this time on different issues, and they were ill prepared again," Steve Cramer said. "What we feel they are doing is using our group as a sounding board before they make a planning application with the county. That has become apparent."

Urbanek said the meetings are supposed to allow both parties to continue to keep a dialogue going, and for the company to flesh out its plans.

"My main hope is the county will realize the impact this will have on the area, and that it's beautiful, very productive farmland and is also a floodplain," she said.

"I would hope they would take that into consideration, and maybe limit a certain amount of (mining) in a certain area . . . It's just too much for one area. It's going to be noisy and, I think, the truck traffic will be unbearable at points.

''Overall, it's very concerning for us, and we still haven't had those concerns alleviated."

The A-B-B CPO's next meeting will be held at 6:30 p.m. Monday, July 17, at Cutsforth's Old Town Hall. An Oregon Asphaltic representative will be present.

"We're property owners out there, too, and we feel we should have our input, as well as to listen to the community's concerns," Urbanek said. "This is an ongoing process."


URD panel calls for meeting
on fire protection

By David Howell
of the Herald

The Canby Urban Renewal Advisory Committee is unanimously urging the city's elected leaders to meet with the Canby Fire District's board of directors to hammer out a fair and amicable agreement regarding fire coverage for the three-phase industrial park.

The 17-member committee, which includes six members of the Industrial Area Association, discussed the hot-button issue of fire coverage for the Logging Road Industrial Park, the first phase of which is the Canby Market Center. The committee made two clear recommendations, said advisory committee chairman Pat Johnson.

The volunteer body recommended the Urban Renewal District Agency, which consists of the Canby City Council, meet with the fire board to debate the issue before July 26, the tentative date URD agency members are due to meet. No agenda has been set.

And it recommended the URD agency give back any funding the fire district forgoes under the district's tax-increment financing mechanism during the up to 20-year life of the URD.

Estimates on the amount of money the fire district would forego during the 20-year period range from $2.7 million to $6 million.

The City Council or URD Agency and the fire board have not sat down and talked about the issue, despite the fact the URD was passed more than six months ago.

Johnson said many members of the committee he chairs feel they have effectively been forced to try to fix the vexing fire coverage funding problem.

"It's going to remain a mess unless the City Council/URD Agency takes care of this issue," he said.

Johnson also questioned the way the issue has been handled so far. The advisory committee's recommendations will be presented to the City Council in time for its July 5 meeting, and prompt action on the matter will be sought, Johnson said.

E-mail Editor to submit information.

homebutt.gif (3171 bytes)